Les mafias

Archive pour la catégorie ‘Légalité en Italie’

Mardi 11 mai l’Hôtel de Galliffet Entrée : 50, rue de Varenne, 75007 Paris à 21h
Réservation : 01 44 39 49 39 

Schiaffo alla mafia de Stefania Casini

[Gifle à la mafia – Italie 2009 – 55’ vostf]

Ce documentaire raconte l’aventure de la coopérative Pio laTorre qui depuis deux ans cultive, avec peine et sacrifices, les terres confisquées à la mafia. Pendant deux années, la réalisatrice a filmé les moments importants, les projets, les rêves, les besoins, mais aussi les conflits internes, les abandons, les découragements la nécessité de dégager du profit.

En présence des réalisateurs. Une vidéo en anglais :

Il est 10h du matin (fictif), quand Giuseppe Baldessarro, redacteur de « il Quotidiano » et collaborateur de la Repubblica ouvre un courrier. Dedans : des projectiles avec un mot empli de sens : « Non andare oltre » : « maintenant cela suffit… les enquêtes ne doivent pas aller plus loin…  »

Cest le 5ème journaliste calabrais victime d’acte d’intimidations en un mois (journaliste de Siderno et blogger de Strill.it

Comme toujours, la sénatrice Angela Napoli, membre de la commission parlementaire antimafia a réagit (cf. Antimafia de droite).

POWERS AND THE ITALIAN MAFIAS

TERRITORIAL CONTROL VS. THE LEGALLY CONSTITUTED STATE

Fabrice Rizzoli phd graduate Italian mafias and international relationships

translation of this article in french politi and constitutional revew

In Italy, the mafia does not exist. The Sicilian mafia-like organization is called Cosa Nostra, in Calabria it is called the ‘Ndrangheta, in Campania, the Camorra, and in Apulia, the Sacra Corona Unita. The four mafia-like organizations, which are generically referred to as the mafia for the sake of simplicity, look alike without being identical. The reader can visualize their historical areas of influence in the following map.

Unlike the Chinese or the Russian phenomena, the Italian mafias are scientifically known, because Italy is a democracy (police, public freedom, independent magistracy, press freedom, pluralism of political parties, university researches, etc.), a political system enabling the production of sources. From 1962 to January 2006 the Parliamentary Commission for the Inquiry into the Mafia was regularly in session and the opposition could present its own report, called “the report of the minority”. Although a verdict on the culpability or innocence of a person under investigation does not give an account of the intensity of the connections between the mafiosi and the ruling class, it is possible to analyze the deeply motivated decisions of the legal system on the other side of the Alps. More recently, geopolitics – the study of the interaction between the territory and the actors on the political stage, their objectives and their strategies – has proven effective for overcoming the interdisciplinarity of the subject “mafia”. By the reappropriation of the instrument of inquiry, geopolitics enables to link seemingly isolated facts together, to rationally interpret them to gain a complete picture between politics, business and criminal associations. Source analysis shows that the history of Italian mafia-like organizations is a history of power management.

The mafia is a political actor that exerts an authority by means of violence. The power of the mafia is based on the accumulation of capitals and their exploitation in a business-like manner. The mafia benefits from social consensus and possesses a political dimension that makes it indispensable for part of the ruling class. The Italian State is one of the best equipped against mafia-like powers.

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE MAFIA: SYSTEMATIC VIOLENCE AND RETICULAR TERRITORIAL CONTROL

A political entity rival to the State, which competes with it for the legal use of violence, the mafia shows its power by means of intimidation. The mafia uses systematic violence to obtain a social network. Systematic violence, sparingly used by a small number of criminals, provides them with a comprehensive control of the populations. Indeed, thanks to violence, which breaks up solidarities and isolates individuals, the mafioso is at the center of society.

Mafia-like violence, also called “planned violence”, founds a parallel legal order. Within the clan, violence awards prestige. Mafia-like execution is a decision of justice used symbolically, as a language. In 1993 a bomb in a church means that the Sicilian mafia holds a grudge against the pope for taking a stand against it. On August 15, 2007, in Duisburg, the clan Nirta-Strangio orders the killing of seven members of a rival family on the day of the Assumption of Mary, as a response to the murder of Maria Strangio on December 25, 2005. When a citizen does not respect the rules imposed by the mafia, they can be murdered even years after their default, in order to make mafia-like law everlasting and more powerful than that of the legally constituted State. Thus, in Calabria, a clan killed a farmer eight years after he refused to sell a piece of land. The mafia eliminates in particular those people that have eluded the Italian law. In a symbolical manner, it takes away from the State its prerogative “justice”. For instance, in September 2008, in a small town near Reggio Calabria, two drivers argue over a parking spot. One of them pulls out a gun and kills the other driver, who is the son-in-law of the local mafia boss. Understanding the extent of his gesture, the murderer runs away. The relatives of the victim arrive on the scene of the accident and try in vain to transport the boss’s son-in-law to the hospital. They leave the corpse in front of the cemetery to gain time against the Italian law. The Calabrese mafia family must indeed apply “planned violence”. The person who committed the crime and who has not turned himself to the Italian law is found murdered with a bullet in the back of his head in Rome twenty-four hours later. The Calabrese clan has just relegated the Italian State to an entity inferior to the mafia: a mafia capable of dealing out a lightning justice.

Violence is equally used to prove the ability to govern the territory. To carry out the checkering of the terrain, the mafias lean on a military power. The four mafias, an army without a uniform, have 24,000 armed soldiers who control the territory of the mafia. In Naples, since the earthquake of 1980, the Camorra has taken control of some areas. The clans seized some reconstructed buildings to accommodate some families without the authorization of the town council. Families feel indebted to the camorrists and protect them in their escape. These “forts” of the Camorra are unique in Europe. Sicily is divided into provinces, which are divided into mandamento, cantons that group together at least three mafia families. In Calabria, the territorial unit is the locale. The cities of Palermo, Naples, and Reggio Calabria are divided into areas as shown in the following map.

Using this type of criminal political subdivisions, the Italian mafias “levy taxes” by systematically extorting money from economic businesses. In Palermo and in Reggio Calabria, 80% of all storekeepers pay the pizzo, the “tax” imposed by the mafia. Racketeering is a demonstration of power and an opportunity to accumulate capitals.

FROM THE ILLEGAL ACCUMULATION OF CAPITAL TO THE INFILTRATION IN THE LEGAL ECONOMY

Every year, the EURISPES (European Institute for Political, Economical, and Social Studies) presents a geo-economical state of the Italian mafias. In 2008, they stored up 130 billion Euros, which represent 10% of the brought-in wealth in Italy. The main source of illegal accumulation of capital is drug trafficking (59 billion Euros). “Ecomafias”, the criminal activities that undermine the environment (cement and waste cycles, illegal trade of works of art and animals), yield 16 billion Euros, whereas the illegal trade of weapons and other kinds of illegal trade yield 5.8 billion. Racketeering, with a turnover of 9 billion, and usury, 15 billion Euros, let the mafia earn 250 million Euros a day.

Since the beginning of the economic crisis, the great amount of available funds has allowed the mafias to win contracts and to invest in the legal economy. According to the Association of Italian Traders, clans invest in construction (37.5%), agriculture (20%), tourism (9%), shops and restaurants (7.5%), due to the strong flow of money that characterizes these activities. We will not go in depth into the topic of this type of infiltration, as it has been effectively treated by other researchers, but we will insist on the porosity of the boundary between illegal and legal activities, of which the “ecomafias” are a paradigm.

The “ecomafias” are a perfect example of the convergence of mafias, economic circles, and certain parts of the administration. The entrepreneurs and the “white collars” – real driving force behind the “ecomafia” system – address mafia-like associations to bury waste in southern Italy or in Africa. In this, the “ecomafias” are a symbol of the perverse effects of globalization and an indicator of the vitality of the mafias. These, which are not the result of economic underdevelopment, as evidenced by their deeply-rooted presence in the United States and northern Italy, are a cog in a dynamic economy (see map below).

The numerous investigations of the magistracy show for instance a strong presence of the four mafias in one of the richest provinces in Europe. The mafiosi extort money, distribute drugs and have many legal businesses.

However, on the territories of the mafia, the population lives in a state of relative underdevelopment. In the South, the unemployment rate is twice as large as in the rest of the territory (about 20%) and reaches 50% in the disadvantaged areas of Naples and Palermo. In these areas, the mafiosi cut off access to drinking water to make the population obey them. These “favors” are in fact rights that the Italian State does not guarantee: a job, a loan, a place in a hospital, etc. These rights do not exist because southern Italy lives in an “organized underdevelopment” that allows the mafiosi to create consensus around their power.

FROM SOCIAL CONSENSUS TO THE “MAFIA BOURGEOISIE”

To receive the consensus of the population, the mafias lean on a system of values (clan organization, secret, rituals, myths) that compete with the foundations of democracy.

Any mafia is based on the notion of clan. Members – male, white, Catholic – form in a given territory a mafia family, a cosca in Sicily, a ‘ndrina in Calabria… The Sicilian cosca is not based on biological ties. One enters by cooptation and by a very special curriculum, which should not show any relationship with the police or with judges called “infamous”. The typical Calabrese mafia family is built on blood ties. The husband of a woman (biologically belonging to a mafia family) may be part of the clan. Indeed, the groom is bound to her by the “mixed blood” that flows in the veins of their children.

The mafia family ensures group cohesion, protects its members from external threat and maintains client-like relationships with people outside the organization. In return, the mafiosi are fully available to the organization and implement all instructions from their superiors. The mafia family has always priority on the biological family. In southern societies, where the trust in institutions is lacking, the mafia family, tyrannical but sympathizing, presents an image of power that reinforces its aura among populations.

The mafia has a cultural code by which there exists a myth common to the three main mafias. The legend sings the praises of Osso, Mastrosso, and Carcagnosso, three knights fleeing the Spanish Inquisition to form secret justice societies, respectively Cosa Nostra in Sicily, the ‘Ndrangheta in Calabria and the Camorra in Campania. Tracing the mafia back in time and making people believe it is based on an idea of ​​justice help create a consensus among the population.

The code states that the mafia-like organization is based on secret. Affiliates must hush up its existence. Like organized crime, the mafia, pragmatic, works underground to protect itself from repression, but in the mafia world secret possesses a symbolic power, emphasized by the mystical-religious rite of affiliation. The recruit, “baptized” by his peers and sworn to become a “man of honor” (the mafiosi do not use the word “mafia”), has the impression of belonging to a higher world. The rite of affiliation is a line of demarcation between the mafia and the rest of the society, a border that makes the mafia an entity higher than the State.

The mafiosi impose secrecy to outsiders by killing those who do not respect the law of silence, the omertà. In Campania, the Casalesi clan ordered the murder of a witness seven years after he had made his statement to the police. By killing those citizens who speak, the mafiosi have made the omertà a “myth”, to the point where they make people believe that the omertà is an integral part of the southern society. By murdering, the mafia turns omertà into a cosmogonic law, higher than human values, ​​and persuades many citizens that one cannot overcome it. In Catania, a mother delivered her 18-year-old son to the clan so that he could be killed. The young man, already a seasoned killer, wanted to collaborate with the law.

All these cultural constructions (the clan, secret, myths, and the law of silence) lead to the idea that the mafia is all powerful and therefore invincible. With the myth of invincibility, populations accept the existence of the mafia as inevitable and can become the silent victims or accomplices.

The cultural code creates a “humus” that is conducive to the natural reproduction of complicity. Around the clan there is always a supportive community. This safety net is essential to the mafias and, ultimately, the strength of the mafiosi relies on their ability to accumulate and use social capital. The network of the mafia, a constellation where people with heterogeneous social background, culture, and appearance coexist, is an instrument, or even a component of power. “The poorest social groups are the recruiting area of labor for the mafias. The heads of the mafia-like organization are able to seal a pactum sceleris with the highest levels of political and economic power, high society”. In Sicily, the Cosa Nostra criminal organization has 5,500 members, that is 0.11% of the Sicilian population. Each mafioso operates within a frame of relationships of complicity that form a network of a hundred thousand people. These people belong to the world of politics, business, freelance professions and administration. This forms a social body, a “private club”, a “mafia bourgeoisie”, capable of influencing politics.

THE INFLUENCE ON POLITICS

Mafia power feeds on its relation to politics. This relation expresses itself in a tortuous way. However, it follows a perennial logic. Confronted with a political mafia, the world of politics symmetrically reinforces the power of the mafia by making decisions favorable to the mafia and securing a certain degree of impunity. This is known as “mafia-like production of politics”.

The actions of politicians perpetuate this phenomenon in a particular cycle. Mafia-like organizations do not recognize the State monopoly on the use of force and employ planned violence. Institutions do not impose their judicial prerogatives by not preventing, for example, the use of extortion: impunity reigns. By legitimizing de facto the non-recognition by the mafia of the monopoly of violence by the State, public powers promote it as a sovereign and rival institution.

The mafia, which is a political actor but not the main character on the political stage, has never expected applying this prerogative as a substitute of the official representatives. This is why it promotes the election of people who are “available” to defend its interests. By influencing the vote of the citizens, the mafias switch parties easily, or willingly rely on currents in a large formation. Pragmatism, economic interest, protection, or even impunity, are the reasons for creating or breaking an alliance. Mafia encourages duplicity in politicians and tolerates that a conniving politician passes laws against it. The mafioso acts respectfully towards the politician and likes to deal with them as an equal. The relationship between the mafia and politics is based on reciprocity: their relations feed on influence, pressure, reciprocal interaction and exchange of favors (support during political campaign in exchange for public contracts). Complicity is evident on a local scale: since 1991 the State has disbanded 171 town councils because of infiltration. At the national level, the grounds for the decision of the release of Giulio Andreotti are emblematic. The Supreme Court says in its final decision on October 15, 2004 that the most important political figure of the first Italian Republic is guilty of participating in a mafia-like association until 1980, but the facts are statute barred.

Since the beginning of the second Republic in 1994, other trials have underlined collusion between political and business circles and the Sicilian mafia, at a time when the latter was planting bombs in Sicily (1992), and in Florence, Milan and Rome (1993). The purpose of these attacks was to establish a new political system after the collapse of the system supported by the Christian Democracy. Indeed, the second Republic was born in 1994 with the accession to power of a coalition of new right-wing parties. Defeated in parliamentary elections in 1995, but again in power from 2001 to 2006, the center-right-wing coalition has engaged in a major mafia-like political production. On August 22, 2001, the Minister of Infrastructure Pietro Lunardi said during an interview on the news of channel Cinque that it was necessary to “coexist” (convivere) with the mafia. Is this statement – favorable to the power of the mafia – the result of ignorance or an appreciation for the victory of the center-right in all of the 61 Sicilian constituencies? Then, from 2001 to 2006, the policies of the center-right were marked by the absence of political will for the implementation of a European arrest warrant, by laws intended to avoid criminal punishment for false statement in account, by the impunity for those who repatriate illegally exported capital, by laws on conflict of interest and especially by the non-respect of justice. These policies are guided by a neoliberal ideology: that of an economy without rules, without transparency and governed solely by the balance of power. Indeed, the economic ideas promoted by the center-right are the same that the mafias support.

Despite this mafia-like production of politics, the Italian State fights against the mafia with sophisticated legal instruments.

THE LEGALLY CONSTITUTED STATE AND THE MAFIA

In September 1982, the legislator inserted into the Criminal Code (in Article 416 bis) an ad hoc incrimination for belonging to a mafia-like association. The main purpose of the new law was to compensate for the inadequacy of the law on criminal conspiracy. The legal successes resulting from the introduction of this article are undeniable. Article 416 bis has overcome many difficulties in terms of the conducting of trials against the mafias. After the first doubts about the constitutionality of these laws were quickly dispelled, interpretative difficulties disrupted the work of the judges. Indeed, willing to define what the mafia is from a sociological point of view, the legislator introduced a number of technical legal problems. The definition of 416 bis is based on the “mafia-like method”, characterized by the use of intimidation in conjunction with the associative link that influences the population. The problem here is convicting people who profit from the reputation of their mafia family. Taking “planned violence” into account, it is understandable that a request for extortion from a mafia family is more daunting than that from a short-lived clan. Sometimes the threat needs not be expressed. The mere fact that the name of a mafia family circulates in an invitation to tender suffices for other competitors to withdraw their bid. In addition, the legislator has even given the mafia a political dimension since 1992 with Article 11 bis and ter, by depicting it as a criminal association capable of influencing the electoral votes: “[…] the association is mafia-like when those who are part of it […] prevent or interfere with the free exercise of vote or provide votes for themselves or to others on the occasion of elections”. In fact, the electoral exchange is difficult to prove, because the complicity expresses itself in a subtle way, as evidenced by the crime of external participation in a mafia-like association.

In the late 1980s, the introduction of the crime of complicity in a mafia-like association formalized the existence of a criminal social body. Originally, the crime was not contemplated by the Italian Criminal Code. Indeed, Article 416 bis punishes members of the mafia for participating in a mafia-like association. The judge therefore has to prove that the person under investigation is a member of the criminal organization. This law is poorly adapted to fight against the network of the mafia, thus the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court has developed the concept of “external participation in a mafia-like association” to convict the conniving politician, banker, or agent of the intelligence services. Although not part of the mafia, the fiancheggiatori (those who are on the side) contribute to a system of favors and collusion that reinforces the power of the mafia. The crime of complicity in a mafia-like association is the legal instrument that aims to fighting mafia bourgeoisie and the political weight of the mafia. Out of 7,190 proceedings started in Italy between 1991 and 2007, 2,959 resulted in a dismissal (archiviazione), 1,992 were sent to a trial court, and 542 convictions were pronounced (against 54 judgments of non doversi procedere). The high number of dismissals of charges impedes the assessment of the effectiveness of the current definition of “external participation”. However, thanks to this legal construction, the court of first instance sentenced Marcello Dell’Utri – founder of the Forza Italia party – to eight years in prison for having objectively strengthened the power of the Sicilian Cosa Nostra.

Italian law loves nuances. It also provides for the figure of the favoreggiatore, a word that derives from favorire (support, promote), which can be translated as an act of complicity, but which denotes the act of helping a mafioso in his business without necessarily supporting the mafia organization as a whole. In January 2008, the President of the Region of Sicily Salvatore Cuffaro welcomed being convicted only of the crime of favoreggiamento at first instance. Salvatore Cuffaro has nevertheless allowed the richest man in Sicily (a member of Cosa Nostra) to “accredit” the care of his private clinic, so that they could be reimbursed by the State. Salvatore Cuffaro resigned. He is now a senator and he is protected by the “impu-immunity”.

Italian law provides for the “extended confiscation” of illegally acquired properties, for their use for social purposes (Act of March 7, 1996), for the legal control of invitations to tender, and for the dismantling of an elected assembly because of infiltration. Finally, the introduction in 1992 of the law on cooperators with the police – criminals who have turned state’s evidence – allowed the study of the phenomenon from the inside and caused a crisis in certain mafias. Above all, by providing a legal framework for the mafioso, so that he can quit the mafia, the State promotes legality against the abuse of mafia-like power.

Violence, accumulation of capital, social consensus, and political collusion are “extra-legal powers” that underpin the longevity of the mafias and form the mafia-like political system. This systemic criminality seems to be a structural way of governance in Italy.

Since the end of the antagonism between the two blocs, which had ordained the mafias as containment against the communist threat, the Italian State has weakened the power of the mafia. In particular, it counters impunity by imprisoning a large number of mafiosi. However, the mafias control the territory at all scales (region, province and municipality), as evidenced by the maps presented in this paper. They also have a transnational dimension, embodying those movements of information, money, goods, and people in which State actors become scarce. Main characters of the integrated global economy and a reflection of this new order, the mafias are structural and systemic phenomena of a globalization that has blurred the boundaries between “legal” and “illegal” (need for labor but criminalization of the immigration, prohibition of drugs that are increasingly consumed, etc.).

Given the 59 billion Euros that the Italian mafias alone store up each year through drug trafficking (main source of illegal accumulation of capital), given the increase in drug use despite prohibition policies, one wonders whether it is time to create the conditions for a calm debate on a possible public regulation of drugs across the European Union. States would thus have a chance to resize the economic power of the mafias and to increase their own authority in the eyes of the population.

SUMMARY

The four Italian mafia-like organizations are secular political entities that control a territory through the application of systemic violence. They accumulate capital and infiltrate the legal economy. Constantly in search of social consensus, they form with their accomplices a criminal social body – the “mafia bourgeoisie” – that strongly influences politics. The Italian State is constantly trying to confine this competition.

Le 3 février dernier, la direction des enquêtes antimafias (DIA) calabraise à fait arrêter 67 personnes : 32 de nationalité italienne et 35 de nationalité indienne. Ces personnes dont des entrepreneurs et des fonctionnaires italiens, sont impliquées dans un trafic transnational d’êtres humains. Les arrestations ont eut lieu à Reggio en Calabre, Milan, Brescia, Crema, Macerata, Sienne, Piacenza, Potenza et Avellino.

Les ‘ndrines (familles mafieuses calabraises) Cordì de Locri (cf. Prison à vie et exécution sommaire) et Iamonte de Melito Porto Salvo sont impliquées.

En général, le mécanisme est le suivant. Les «étrangers » font venir les immigrés sur les côtes calabraises et payent une redevance aux clans en vertu de la règle du contrôle du territoire (cf.‘Ndrines, armes et contrôle du territoire).

Mais en l’occurrence, les clans en question fortement infiltrés dans le tissu économique italien (cf. 200 millions d’euros saisis à la mafia calabraise, pouvaient produire des faux contrats de travail afin que les immigrés obtiennent des permis de séjour. Chaque immigré payait entre 10 000 et 18 000 euros à cette organisation inter-ethnique (cf. United of colors of dealers). L’enquête ayant débuté en 2007, les enquêteurs estiment que les revenus de l’organisation mafieuse s’élève à 6 millions d’euros.

Heureusement, un entrepreneur agricole a porté plainte démontrant que la Calabre possède les anticorps antimafieux (cf.L’Italie, la Calabre et les anticorps). En, effet, les mafieux l’avaient contraint céder ses entreprises et à faire des faux documents pour embaucher des immigrés Pakistanais et Indiens.

Ndlr : les anglo-saxons utilisent deux termes bien distincts pour évoquer le traite d’être humains ou le trafic illégal de migrants. Pour le trafic illégal de migrants ils parlent de smuggling et pour la traite des êtres humains ils utilisent le terme trafficking. Voir http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trafic_d%27%C3%AAtres_humains

Le 3 février dernier, la direction des enquêtes antimafias calabraise à fait arrêter 67 personnes : 32 de nationalité italienne et 32 de nationalité indiennes. Ces personnes dont des entrepreneurs et des fonctionnaires, sont impliquées dans un trafic d'être humains qui aurait rapporté plus de 6 millions d'euros. Les arrestations ont eut lieu à Reggio en Calabre, Milan, Brescia, Crema, Macerata, Sienne, Piacenza, Potenza et Avellino.
Les familles mafieuses calabraises, les Cordì de Locri () et les Iamonte de Melito Porto Salvo sont impliquées

En général, le mécanisme est le suivant. Les «étrangers » font venir les immigrés sur les côtes calabraises et payent une redevance en vertu de la règle du contrôle du territoire. Mais en l'occurrence, les clans en question fortement infiltrés dans le tissu économique italien, les clans calabrais pouvait produire des faux contrats de travail afin que les immigrés obtiennent des permis de séjour. Chaque immigré payait entre 10 et 18 000 euros. L'enquête ayant débuté en 2007, la magistrature estime que les revenu de l'organisation mafieuse s'élève à 6 millions d'euros.

Heureusement, un entrepreneur agricole a porté plainte (cf. ) car les mafieux l'avait contraint céder ses entreprises et a faire des faut pour embaucher des immigrés Pakistanais et Indiens.

Revue Pouvoirs : 132 janvier 2010 – 224 pages – Le crime organisé

Les organisations criminelles cherchent et exercent des pouvoirs. Certaines d’entre elles disposent d’une influence sur le politique et l’économie d’abord parce qu’elles visent à protéger et développer un commerce illégal. Que se passe-t-il lorsque le crime est organisé comme une entreprise ? Prenant appui sur les échelles locales et internationales, Pouvoirs fait le point sur la question.

Fabrice RIZZOLI – Pouvoirs et mafias italiennes. Contrôle du territoire contre Etat de droit

Pouvoirs n°132 – Le crime organisé – janvier 2010 – p.41-55

Les quatre organisations mafieuses italiennes sont des entités politiques séculaires qui contrôlent un territoire par l’application d’une violence systémique. Elles accumulent des capitaux et infiltrent l’économie légale. Sans cesse à la recherche du consensus social, elles forment avec leur complice un corps social criminel, la « bourgeoisie mafieuse », qui conditionne fortement la vie politique. L’État de droit italien n’a de cesse d’endiguer cette concurrence. Abstract

Référence électonique : Fabrice RIZZOLI, « Pouvoirs et mafias italiennes. Contrôle du territoire contre Etat de droit », Pouvoirs, revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, n°132, 2010, p.41-55. Consulté le 28-01-2010. URL : http://www.revue-pouvoirs.fr/Pouvoirs-et-mafias-italiennes.html

Le 12 décembre, le quotidien « Il giornale » révèle que le tribunal de Bologne vient de libérer, pour raison de santé, le mafieux Gerlando Alberti Junior (en photo), et de le placer aux arrêts domiciliaires. Agé de 71 ans, Alberti Junior est le neveu de Gerlando Alberti, un des plus grand trafiquant d’héroïne de Cosa nostra sicilienne dans les années 80. On peut se demander si Graziella, la victime d’Alberti Junior n’a pas été assassiné une 5ème fois (cf. Bonne nuit Graziella).

Attention tout de même à ne pas faire le jeu d’une certaine presse sous contrôle du clan Berlusconi, en particulier le canard « Il giornale » véritable instrument de propagande pour le président du Conseil. En effet, soit le mafieux a été libéré sans raison valable et c’est un scandale, soit il est en phase terminale et il doit être libéré. L’Italie est un état de droit (cf. L’Italie : ce pays modèle). Une inspection est en cours.

En s’attardant sur cette nouvelle, le journal en question jette l’opprobre sur les magistrats, ceux-la même qui poursuivent le président du Conseil dans d’autres affaires (cf. Spatuzza).

Je dédie ce billet aux elèves de 1ES2 de Nantes qui ont choisi les relations médias-mafias pour leur exposé, un sujet bien difficile pour des lycéens francophones.

Il avait 18 ans et sortait d’un pizzeria de Taurianova en Calabre lorsque les sicaires font éclater une pluie de balles. Francesco Maria Inzitari est le neveu de Nino Princi, tué dans l’explosion de sa voiture en mai 2008 (cf. Voiture piégée en Calabre). Pour les enquêteurs, il s’agit vraisemblablement d’une « vengeance transversale » de la ‘Ndrangheta (cf. Vengeance “transversale” à Rosarno?).

Francesco Maria Inzitari décède car il est le fils de Pasquale Inzitari, ancien adjoint au maire de Rizziconi et conseiller provincial de l’UDC (centre-droit). Pasquale Inzitari avait été arrêté en mai 2008 pour concours externe en association mafieuse. En septembre dernier, la justice avait saisi 55 millions de biens lui appartenant.  Pasquale Inzitari était d’abord proche du clan Crea, dominant à Rizziconi (cf. L’Italie et les stéréotypes) qui a permis la construction du plus grand centre commercial en Calabre. Des membres du clan Crea ont acheté plusieurs terrains agricoles y compris par la menace, le conseil municipal (dissout en juillet 2000 pour infiltration mafieuse) a alors modifié le plan d’occupation des sols, rendant les terrains constructibles. Les complicités politiques remontent jusqu’au conseil régional qui modifié la législation afin de permettre la construction d’un centre commercial pourtant interdit jusqu’ici. C’est sur ce terrain qu’a été construit la grande surface, appartenant en partie à Inzitari. Mais les rapports entre Inzitari et les Crea se sont peu à peu détériorés. Profitant de l’arrestation du boss Teodoro Crea, Inzitari fait entrer Antonino Princi (et par là même le clan Rugolo, cf. La mafia calabraise, une histoire de familles) dans le capital social du centre commercial. Une insulte pour le clan Crea… et un grain de sable dans la mécanique économique mondialisée comme en témoigne ce reportage :

Le mardi 1er décembre, le groupe Flare (Freedom, Legality and Rights in Europe),  organisait une manifestion devant le Conseil des ministres de l’Union européenne à Bruxelles. Flare est le premier réseaux (issu de la société civile) contre le crime organisé  transnational.

La présence de Flare dans la « capitale » de l’Union avait pour but de convaincre les ministres de la justice des 27 pays de l’Union réunis en Conseil que les fonds confisqués au crime organisé doivent être utilisés à des fins sociales. Ce dispositif législatif utilisé en Italie donne des résultats encourageants (cf. De la saisie à la confiscation; de la mafia à l’Etat?).  Par exemple, la maison confisquée au chef de la mafia sicilienne, Salvatore Riina (cf. Leçon de communication mafieuse par Toto Riina) est aujourd’hui un centre culturel (cf. la Croix). De point de vue ciminologique, ce procédé est très efficace parce qu’il prive les mafieux de consensus social (cf. Les ‘ndrines et le consensus social).

Dans la rue, les militants ont joué à CONFISCOPOLIS, un jeu de société avec lequel on confisque des biens mal acquis.

Comme les photos en témoignent, la manifestation (autorisée par les autorités) fut une réussite et ce en dépit d’une première intervention de la police qui nous a fait  remballer. Le magistrat Luigi de Magistris nouvellement élu député européen, les médias, la police… et surtout le commissaire Jacques Barrot ont entendu le message. Ce dernier en particulier s’est déclaré favorable à la réutilisation des biens confisqués au crime organisé à des fins sociales (cf. déclaration)

Confiscopolis Le quartier général avait autorisé la manifestation jusqu’à 15h mais sur le terrain, les agents de police avaient un ordre de mission qui indiquait 13h. Il aura fallu l’intervention d’un officier de la police des renseignements généraux pour recommencer la manifestation.
Le député Luigi De Magistris